Translated towards Personal Exchange convinced- there are various rewards in the matrimony, with quite a few barriers who would establish much more punishing if the a wife planned to divorce case
Personal Exchange Theory claims that society comes with ever-present relationships one of people who just be sure to optimize benefits if you find yourself minimizing can cost you. Fundamentally, individuals is rational animals capable of making voice solutions when the benefits and you can drawbacks of your own selection was understood. So it theory uses a formula determine the possibility and come up with processes (REWARDS-COSTS) = Consequences. This is translated to what I get from the jawhorse without the things i lose by-doing they translates to my decision. During the 1979 Levinger and Moles blogged its design for which it talked about the fresh intellectual possibilities produced by spouses who were given divorcing or leftover partnered. It’s been described as Levinger’s Model. Levinger’s Model is Web sites-Traps +/- Alternative Sites = My personal Choice to stay ple out of exactly how Levinger’s Model explains new solutions some one might make and their thought benefits and you can will set you back.
During the Dining table dos you notice that Levinger’s Web sites basically the newest magnets you to definitely draw you to the wedding or rewards one stem out of being married. Every person defines his own sites. Levinger’s Barriers are simply the costs or punishments that could be obtain if a wedded person made a decision to divorce. These you are going to were losing most of the sites and you will magnets, switching so you’re able to an awful standing, distress a department of wide range, co-parenting well away and instead of exact same-domestic convenience, experiencing a positive change/decline in intimate regularity and predictability, losing medical and you may stress buffer you to maried people enjoy (even unhappily maried people experience specific measure of which buffer), while some. Continue reading “Assumptions within this idea are similar to Dispute Theory assumptions yet , has the interactionist underpinnings”